Quantcast
Channel: Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry

Within this dominant all other objects are interre...

0
0
Within this dominant all other objects are interrelated and interact quite freely. Subjects are completely free as part of its dominant, but the dominant has no right to exist, and only exists because of this freedom of movement of the objects.

It is clear that in this text the key word-concept becomes "danger". It is in his or her framework are considered and all other concepts: "road", "car", "not to get on the road", etc. If the word-concepts it is not possible to correlate with the keyword, it means that the text is built wrong, bad, etc.

Surprisingly, despite the fact that the dominant is a very important state of an object, the synonyms for it are almost there. But as a synonym can be: determinant, the main (General, special, key, main, primary, fundamental, core, hub, Central), etc. All of these synonyms suggests that there is a chief, main, Central, etc. sense, which becomes a prelude build all the other meanings in the text.

In the scientific literature rightly argues that w...

0
0
In the scientific literature rightly argues that words themselves do not exist. It is in the context of other words, which determines their content. Of course it is also true that the context has completed part of the text, as well as the entire text, which determines the basic meaning of words and sentences.

Reasoning about some incremental sense, is right only in that part which concerns the General meaning of the words used. This means that no matter which rich content and flexible structure of the word would not be, it still has its limits of use. And whatever context we took every word fits, every sentence can be easily inserted into the text, especially not transforming them.

And how significantly would the basic meaning of the word has not been transformed from the basic essence of the word to go will not be possible. That is why the words are divided into classes, subclasses and so form a structured totality within a certain common sense. The different values they acquire only to a certain limit.

Poet correct in principle, the claim that the context changes and in fact is often a significantly original meaning of the word, however, must be clearly stated, or at least to describe the scope of these the most significant changes, i.e. to what extent it is subject to change and in what contexts it can be put, and which are not.

So, when we talked about the synonyms and the cont...

0
0
So, when we talked about the synonyms and the context indicates that the word located on the periphery of the core content of the meaning or its derivative can not be directly inserted into the main context. It can be part of the content of the basic meaning, or it can be formed in the overall contextual meaning, but only through indirect meanings or contexts. And often such indirect meanings are very long chains.

But the origin itself is the context? We can say that the context is dominant, and the latter in turn task. The difference lies in the fact that the dominant, as well as the task of describing the object, so to speak, in collapsed form, while the context describes the object in expanded form, showing all the available Arsenal of words-concepts. Why context and has acquired a very important meaning in the theory of knowledge.

The challenge is the overall concept which shows how to change the public or private kind of quality. The dominant feature is the "refinement" of human behavior in the external environment in the system of special objects external to the subject area. Dominant is an indication of the sense, ie, why a person need to "fit" that it wants to buy. Constant, in turn, is an extended description of the meaning, demonstrate the scope of actions when solving a problem, including the external and internal environment.

And after that person or to punish or pardon. Know...

0
0
And after that person or to punish or pardon. Known to all: "can Not execute pardon". Depending on where to put a comma changes the context and the destiny of man. These are good demagogues, especially from politics, the judiciary, journalists, etc. However each of us consciously or not consciously, more often, freely, more freely moving words from one context to another and thereby completely obfuscates the main point, i.e. what I wanted to negotiate side.

Confusing especially when it is good. At least means that one understands the process of education the context and change the meaning of words. The realization and formalization of the process (what often really is demagoguery), means open the way to knowledge, as the ability to create different contexts and embed it in the right words is a direct path to the knowledge of a new fact, and from it the solution to your problem.

When a person confuses unknowingly, willingly and correctly creates new contexts and inserts random words, then that's too bad, because he does not understand the process of formation of new knowledge, and accordingly is not able to solve the problem. What a bunch of nuts we collected, never created the machine. What would a bunch of words we write, will never be complicated coherent text for the task.

The ability to create the context and the ability to use within the created context of the word is a form of cognition, And of cognition formalized when there is an understanding of how this is done, for a person to do it and why to do it. Moreover conscious the permissible scope of use of such a mechanism as a context for solving some special, or similar tasks.

We mentioned a little earlier that the dominant determines the content words and the relationship between them. It is the dominant feature becomes the only object, which acts an objective, a purpose or overall meaning of the text or suggestions. More precisely, the task defines the key word which denotes dominance. In turn, it is the dominant chooses words and puts them in a special content in strict accordance with the task.

Following from this we can say that context there ...

0
0
Following from this we can say that context there is a certain set of specially related words, which are determined by the dominant or common task. Of course, if replaced by dominant, read the task that has been changed or the words or their content or the relationship between them. But it is important to bear in mind that contexts can be many and they are located in a hierarchy from General to specific. That is why talking about some fundamental sense of the word, which in fact is determined by the General context. But within this General context there are other contexts, which determine the private value of the word.

And conceptual context, or the context words and the context of events mandatory subject to the General laws of education context. And since context events are always interrelated and interdependent, and the context as interrelated and interdependent. It is the context of the events and determines not only the content of the word, but the nature of the relationship of words.

The context may be determined or natural events or artificial formation. So, creating a certain frequency distribution of the number of words you can create an artificial context. If you create an artificial context, it may be in conflict with the context of direct events or with a wider context, the speaker is dominant. But anyway, that is dominant determines the order in which smyslopolaganie.

Moreover, people can create and always creates its own artificial context when deciding their objectives, which in any case did not contradict the General and the private context of the words. Just the meaning that a person invests in a word, within its context, necessarily emanate from some common and the private value of the content words. The latter acts as the object that the person takes into account when building their own context. It must be borne in mind that the form of expression context is changed, acquires its own specificity and is often so great, that suggests about their otherness and uniqueness of each individual context.

The first context, there is a proposal that define...

0
0
The first context, there is a proposal that defines the content words and the relationships between them. Of course this relationship is governed by its own laws and regulations. But adding another related offer we are already transforming the original meaning of the context. And so prisovokupleniem all new and new suggestions, as long as it is not formed, having its General sense, and therefore a single context. Why and argues that the context has finished and the linked text or part of it.

The context has its own special structure, where each element performs a specific role. The context structure is the following: the dominant, the object describing a condition or a process object describing the fact that key word. In fact, the existence of means the description of the state. The parameters of time, place, and action. The main variable of the object around which everything revolves. It determines the parameters described above. The main object is determined by the task, which puts people.

If there is a context keyword, then the need is established between the logical connection. The content of such communication is determined by a certain dominant feature common to the context and key words, the nature of the relationship established by the logic of their interaction, as a formal moment, which becomes the dominant feature in itself.

In this regard, it makes sense to install a small dictionary of key terms - objects contained in the context structure.

The dominat - standard situation, which is formed ...

0
0
The dominat - standard situation, which is formed by the solution of a General problem and describes (gets the name) of the short-term. The contents of this word-concept is well known as the situation model. In an uncertain situation such word-concept does not exist.
Object - the element of a common model of the situation having its specific characteristics, is partially reflected in the General word-concept, but each having its own description and often his word-concept. The principle of building repeats the General model of the situation.
The context - a set of identical elements of different objects (as it podobjekte) included in the General model the situation. It is their identity allows to define the content, the meaning of certain key words-concepts.
The key word-the concept - the most specific private situation, which was formed as a concept in the result of the formation of consciousness, and which requires their conceptual descriptions.
Fact - a conceptual reflection of the consciousness of the external object subject area, exposed the true and stable knowledge in the solution of man's challenges.

The structure of the context determines the nature...

0
0
The structure of the context determines the nature of the inter-relationships of objects in relation to solve human tasks, which is the key word. If this keyword is not included in the concept and the structure of the context and not defined by them. As well as a keyword does not define the content of the context. The context in this case is considered as finished object, that is the key word.

Let's take a small sentence: "men are mortal". Here we have two objects (word): "people", "death", and a bunch of "is", which means. These objects can have different contents in different situations. But may have something in common, in a particular situation. Provided in the proposal, they acquire the General meaning due to the presence of a certain General, acting as dominate.

So in the sentence "Men are mortal" also has something in common, something that unites them, i.e., the presence of such element that is in each of them. The object "people" is always present the element of mortality, but the object "deaths" is composed of the element - man. It is clear that the object "people" and "mortality" have a variety of other elements, which become the basis for any other entities. The truth is many always be dominant.

The suggestion dominant there may be different words. The word often is the key. So, in the sentence "Men are mortal" dominant can be "mortality". Implied copula "is" indicates this. In this case, the word "death" includes some characteristics of the object "people", namely, the fact that they are as human beings cease to exist. But the dominant feature may be the word "people". Then this word will define the concept of "death". Depending on the change of the dominant and changing the context. In the first case is a man. in the second case, mortality.

In the proposal, the dominant is established as a ...

0
0
In the proposal, the dominant is established as a fact, which is in the process of the interaction constant. Moreover, having the longest time indicator - always have constant action - mortality and therefore a constant place - a person's life. In other words mandatory, the principle of the unity of place, time and action. Thus, the main subject in this sentence is not "people" and not "mortality", and that "people are always mortal."

It is the primary object of the concept and the problem you want to solve using logic, reasoning, or as we call it - contextual logic, i.e. the logic of the context. If you do not violate the laws of its construction, the concept becomes true, at least for one person. However in this case it takes the form of a conceptual-hypothetical or perhaps real knowledge.

And that would prove, need to do some mandatory operations: to specify the main object, to show that is dominant, to determine the nature of the action and to set time limits, place of origin events. And most importantly to establish the nature of the relationship between them. The last is the most difficult, because the nature and essence of communication is always dictated by the manmade task.

In a world of many different typical situations, precisely the world always consists of typical situations. (The uncertainty of this deviation from the model situation). Each scenario describes short-term, which reflects the main characteristics of this type of situation, but only in the most General terms. Each scenario contains some many similar objects, which in some of its parts, as elements, describe the General model of the situation. Naturally the contents of each such object has a reflection in some part in the basic word-concept. But, nevertheless, each object has its specific content. Each such object is essentially a fragment or a private area of a common model of the situation.

Each private region total typical situations basic word-concept can change its meaning and often very dramatically. As a result of the decision of particular tasks is the word-concept can no longer be used because it does not describe this private situation. Clear. that this notion should be clarified.

Such private areas or objects or fragments can be ...

0
0
Such private areas or objects or fragments can be in principle endless. Though this set is always limited by many restrictions, and first of all, the common challenge facing the General contextual totality. But each such fragment is formed that reflects or task that puts people. In this problem minimized is the totality of the main features or characteristics inherent in the objects of this fragment.

To determine the content of context of the overall model of the situation is possible only by means of word-concepts inherent in this fragment. But these word-concepts must be known in the part that describes adequately this fragment. Each such fragment to contain its elements as its component parts. And as we said just above, these parts or elements must be identical. Only then can they adequately describe the new area in their tasks. It is the identity of the elements is the context that gives meaning to the keyword.

As can be seen from the previous paragraph, all these terms have a common principle of construction, but each time it acquires its specific content, depending on the task. In other words, the conceptual design is the same, but the various tasks takes a different name. The result is concepts: the situation, object, element, context, word, sentence, etc.

Each concept describes a number of synonyms. A syn...

0
0
Each concept describes a number of synonyms. A synonym is a word concept that describes the different condition of the same situation. So the proposal, as a General field has its objects, which are respectively described in different words-concepts.

When solving a particular problem posed by the person, the contents of each such word-concepts specified by a certain set of similar objects, called the context. Similar objects in the sense that they have identical elements. The last and form the content, the meaning, which requires a person.

For example, below we present a description of some objects by other objects or words, concepts., which essentially form the context, i.e. in the framework of the given word gets its content. Outside this context the word concept has no content. Additionally, the contexts have several levels in descending order, the so-called hierarchical level. But in which can develop parallel contexts.

The first level of context. The situation - a cond...

0
0
The first level of context. The situation - a condition, circumstance, setting. Within this context we can highlight several contexts: condition, circumstance, setting and So the condition can be described with the following words-concepts - agreement, Treaty, contract, furnished. But in this context we can highlight several contexts: the agreement - a Covenant, Convention, treatise, etc.

Go back one level of context. Fact - the reason, moment, factor, Treaty, agreement, collusion. Further, the second level of the context: cause - reason, point, basis. The third level of context: reason - argument, argument, motive, sense. The fourth level of context: time - the time, hour, moment, time, etc.

Return to the first level of context: installation - Assembly, device construction, device, fixture, apparatus, unit, node. Parallel level context: object - subject, subject, object. In this parallel context level is set to the second level of the context hierarchy: subject - subject, question, problem, goal, motive, phrase, etc.

Again go back one level of context. Eof element component, ingredient, component, part, item, link.
Go back one level of context: the Word - promise, promise, word, pledge. The second level of context: the vow - an oath, oath, vow, promise. The word-concept proposal as an ordinary object is described by such words-concepts as judgment, suggestion. In turn, the judgment is described such objects as the opinion, consideration, opinion, view, viewpoint, concept, idea, etc.

Thus we have described almost all objects of the g...

0
0
Thus we have described almost all objects of the given conceptual field of the sentence context. The scheme is of course not complete and shows only the principle of education of any context, but it is important to emphasize that the principle is clear formations is always the same, variations can be endless.

Let's give another very good example of the description of the conceptual field - of-context norms of social behavior. It also consists of individual concepts, the concepts of blocks and number of blocks of concepts. Moreover, the ratio of their mandatory hierarchical preserving the possibility of a parallel development in the framework of a hierarchical level. (See. tab. below)

The first row contains five blocks of concepts that contains 38 word-concepts, which mainly describe a fairly rigid system of social laws, regulations, and standards. Used concepts describe a system that, in General, necessary that is necessary, possible or recommended for implementation.

In the framework of the first block describes a downward system of rigid rules of behavior: act, law, custom, tradition, rule, sample.

The second block describes the concepts of softer behaviours: instruction, installation, Directive, order, order, command, prescription, direction. If the first block uses the concept of the law, in the second case - manual.

But the third block describes the conceptual rules...

0
0
But the third block describes the conceptual rules of standard of conduct: standard, stereotyped, stereotyped, stereotypical, normal, typical, ordinary, normal, standard.

The fourth block concepts even more softens norms of behavior. They (concepts) are already do not the hard rule or custom, and that. as people usually do: usually, commonly, generally, typically, ordinary, ordinary, simple, commonplace, humdrum, prosaic.

And the fifth section describes the concept of normal typical behavior. In other words, as people do just because they typically. We can say that such a region behavior is a result of education, socialization, etc.: manner, habit, skill, habit, style.

But there is a conceptual description so to say for licit, traditional, normative, habitual, etc. behavior. Most often it is called illegal, anti social, antisocial behavior, etc. But most likely it can be called the conduct of another social field that is, or in conflict with the generally accepted normative field of social behavior or other simple tradition, and so the number of blocks of concepts contains 42 word - concepts.

Again, the first block of the second row starts with the concept of a rigid definition of this behaviour is lawless, illegal, illegal, illegal, powerless.

But the second unit uses the concept that a more m...

0
0
But the second unit uses the concept that a more moderate describe this behavior: not clever stupid, silly, idiotic, pointless, vain, futile, useless, fruitless, vain, vain, vain, vain.

The third block uses the concepts have been forbidden content: it is impossible, forbidden, forbidden, ordered, not allowed, cannot be sanctioned.

The fourth component is the concept of sanctions for anti social behaviour: punishment, retribution, payback, punishment, revenge, will neutralize the sanctions.

And the fifth unit concept quite soft of behavior: correct, correct, adjust, restore, stimulate, fix, correcting, pointing, prescription, neutralize, adjust.

The third row of blocks containing 15 words - conc...

0
0
The third row of blocks containing 15 words - concepts describes the system of social rewards for appropriate behavior. i.e. adherence to social norms and laws. But not only, describes a system of transformation rules through a neutral attitude to the norms, including in case of violation and promotion (compliance or violation). Neutral attitude and encouragement is not only the norm stabilization of social norms, but also their development. This is the path to the transformation of social norms and creating new ones.

Therefore, the block of the third row contains the concept of neutral, the second block is possible, allowed, permitted, welcome, this, authorized, etc. And, as we have said, this applies not only to the case of compliance, but can apply to the case of their violation. The third block - reward, reward, promotion, etc. the Fourth block is the transition to changes in social norms: modifications, revisions, transformations, variations, changes. Fifth block - the creation of new social norms.

Thus, the contextual synonymic line always descri...

0
0

Thus, the contextual synonymic line always describes a kind of conceptual field, expressed by the words-symbols. Any conceptual education within the framework of this conceptual space has its content and meaning. Contextual synonymic feature of the procedure lies in the fact that due to historical reasons, is a single, coherent and objectively existing conceptual field.

You can call it a natural conceptual field as it exists regardless of private, individual researchers and taken them as a given. Unlike artificial conceptual space that the researcher himself creates in the analysis, highlighting some of the conceptual entity as a dominant, which we will do in the future in our work in the analysis of the text.

But the whole difficulty lies in the fact that almost explicitly conceptually synonymous, the procedure is not used. He would like to be on the second level of the semantic space. All strict synonyms hierarchical system acts as a kind of crystal lattice, the coordinate system within which to build any artificial conceptual image of the text.


So - not a typical situation there are just variations of the interactive whiteboard andttions tipavich situations. That is why it is possible in principle to learn to understand and use when solving their tasks. In the case of atypical situations, she simply decomposed into some synonymous a number of typical situations taking into account the specifics of their relationship. But then again develops, but as comprehended and thus turn into well-known and typical situation. So goingaboutdit is the increment of knowledge.

sequence of characters forming the message. A text...

0
0
sequence of characters forming the message. A text key concept of linguistics, hermeneutics, semiotics, cultural studies etc. the Text is discursive unity, with mnohosmyslov structure, generating new meanings. The text evolved on the basis of literature from monopolstellung to complex. Serves the purpose of storage and transmission of information as collective memory, capable of continuous replenishment. (From the culturological dictionary.)
Information is not popular knowledge.
Living nature also commits your changes on physical media that is widely used by archeologists, paleontologists, and many others. But this fixation, so to speak, is not meaningful, spontaneous, whereas in consciousness by fixing the conceptual knowledge.
Thus, the analytical review, for example, political events generally relies on the analysis of the meanings reflected in separate statements (sentences), of the analyte.

Probably everyone faced with the fact that it is n...

0
0
Probably everyone faced with the fact that it is not always possible to cover the entire meaning of even relatively small text, often has to be limited to meaning of text fragments, embedded in sentences and simple paragraphs. This has many reasons, one of which is disability is not a trained memory to keep large chunks of text and link them together in meaning. This is called surface reading.
Incidentally this applies not only to texts. In practical life people are constantly faced with this phenomenon, i.e. the fact that it is, so to speak not to the naked eye and what is hidden under "a pile of phenomena". What is seen is usually standard knowledge for solution of typical problems. What is hidden, this area is not known, but informed as possible knowledge to solve the possible problems, of course, in different areas of life, including in the text. But the ratio of the standard and the unknown (but assumed), "surface" and depth are different in nature.
At all times, and most often among Church leaders, was necessarily the so-called interpreter of the texts, which seems to be the only "opened" the true meaning of certain texts and often sacred. And in fact opened, because with a lot of practice, it was possible to find in the text that helped solving the problem.
Content analysis is often perceived as a method of analysis of the text content. In fact examines only the frequency distribution of a characteristic that already has meaning that can give it some importance. Appears a different meaning, but not the symptom, and the frequency distribution of its meaning, he is a new object.

The struggle is proof of his innocence The world o...

0
0
The struggle is proof of his innocence
The world of words, hypotheticesky world
Words, thoughts have a system of playing possible situations. When we argue, we build a logical framework of action with known or suspected known parcels. Respectively mentally committed actions, which later can make real.
But the real things are almost always different from those anticipated, and if not different, then are totally or partially not true.
Thus the world of words, is the world's alleged actions, which only simulates reality, in order to make a real step. And nothing more.

I am really inspired together with your writing ta...

0
0
I am really inspired together with your writing talents
as neatly as with the structure for your blog.
Is this a paid subject or did you customize it yourself?
Anyway keep up the nice high quality writing, it's uncommon to look a nice weblog like this one these days..

Hello! I've been following your web site for s...

0
0
Hello! I've been following your web site for some time
now and finally got the courage to go ahead and give you
a shout out from Kingwood Texas! Just wanted to say keep up the
fantastic job!

That is a great tip particularly to those new to t...

0
0
That is a great tip particularly to those new to the blogosphere.
Short but very precise info… Thank you for sharing this one.
A must read article!

A debt of gratitude is for this post. Adornments a...

0
0
A debt of gratitude is for this post. Adornments are the most loved thing of all the ladies. In the message, all sorts of gems resemble all young ladies. Especially at the traditional wedding, all women are getting ready for the traditional gems. Gems are useful for the graduation n a splendid future.

I love watching Ying the Pearl Hunter. She's m...

0
0
I love watching Ying the Pearl Hunter. She's my favorite to Watch!!!




Latest Images