The action always represents the active power, the dominant principle which defines the coordinate system moving subject. Because it allows you to solve the problem with the active movement of the subject on the grid of time and space.
People can distinguish the concept of "action" and "movement". Although they have a common origin-the moment of transfer of the product in a physical form, ¡ however, describe essentially different situation. Action ¡this is a deliberate act, while the movement can be unfocused, chaotic. But that's not entirely accurate, every movement purposefully. The difference is that the notion of "action" describes the situation when the goal is conscious. The term "movement" describes the situation when the person cannot realize, to understand the purpose of the movement of any subject, including himself. The concept of "action" has as its content the set man the task, while the concept of "motion" implies an action that is not the solution. It must be emphasized that the notion of "action" has as its content is exclusively a human activity aimed at solving a specific task. Equally the effect of any other subject is viewed through the prism of its objectives. And if these tasks are not understood by man, the action becomes a "movement." In the philosophical literature, it is accepted that the concept of "movement" is more General than the concept of "action", such as a circuit in nature. But it is subject to more General laws relating to person, ie has its own mission, a purpose.
The objective value of an action is solely as past experience. So, the environment is perceived as external only in the context of past experience and not in any other version. But new objective reality is also reflected in the framework of past experience. In the case that the external movement does not correspond to past experience, it is broken down into a series of special motions, which again can only be interpreted in the framework of past experience. Combining them, in order to integrate in any system, the person solves the task.
![]()
People can distinguish the concept of "action" and "movement". Although they have a common origin-the moment of transfer of the product in a physical form, ¡ however, describe essentially different situation. Action ¡this is a deliberate act, while the movement can be unfocused, chaotic. But that's not entirely accurate, every movement purposefully. The difference is that the notion of "action" describes the situation when the goal is conscious. The term "movement" describes the situation when the person cannot realize, to understand the purpose of the movement of any subject, including himself. The concept of "action" has as its content the set man the task, while the concept of "motion" implies an action that is not the solution. It must be emphasized that the notion of "action" has as its content is exclusively a human activity aimed at solving a specific task. Equally the effect of any other subject is viewed through the prism of its objectives. And if these tasks are not understood by man, the action becomes a "movement." In the philosophical literature, it is accepted that the concept of "movement" is more General than the concept of "action", such as a circuit in nature. But it is subject to more General laws relating to person, ie has its own mission, a purpose.
The objective value of an action is solely as past experience. So, the environment is perceived as external only in the context of past experience and not in any other version. But new objective reality is also reflected in the framework of past experience. In the case that the external movement does not correspond to past experience, it is broken down into a series of special motions, which again can only be interpreted in the framework of past experience. Combining them, in order to integrate in any system, the person solves the task.