Marx sees, for example, in the categorical system of the bourgeois
of political economy. These forms "have time to acquire strength natural
forms of life before people will make a first attempt to give an account not in
the historical character of these forms -- the latter is already, on the contrary, acquired
them the nature of the reality, but only in the content"[3]. Exploring these
objective thought forms, Marx emphasizes several key
moments. First, it is the formation of "public interest" objective,
and not the product of some subjective illusions; second, the area of importance
these forms are not confined to bourgeois political economy, and
extends to other areas of social life; thirdly, these forms are not
remain only an abstract regulations, but imposing at all
the specific ideas about society and his place in it,which
fold the participants of a particular system of socio-economic
production in a particular historical era; fourthly, they are
not only results of social practice n knowledge, but themselves
become prerequisites for those specific socio-practical and
cognitive processes that occur in these forms; fifth,
finally, they are of a certain limit, is not available further analysis
reality; on the contrary, these "ridiculous" forms is always a certain
a different reality (e.g. the monetary form of commodity production
hidden social labor).![]()
of political economy. These forms "have time to acquire strength natural
forms of life before people will make a first attempt to give an account not in
the historical character of these forms -- the latter is already, on the contrary, acquired
them the nature of the reality, but only in the content"[3]. Exploring these
objective thought forms, Marx emphasizes several key
moments. First, it is the formation of "public interest" objective,
and not the product of some subjective illusions; second, the area of importance
these forms are not confined to bourgeois political economy, and
extends to other areas of social life; thirdly, these forms are not
remain only an abstract regulations, but imposing at all
the specific ideas about society and his place in it,which
fold the participants of a particular system of socio-economic
production in a particular historical era; fourthly, they are
not only results of social practice n knowledge, but themselves
become prerequisites for those specific socio-practical and
cognitive processes that occur in these forms; fifth,
finally, they are of a certain limit, is not available further analysis
reality; on the contrary, these "ridiculous" forms is always a certain
a different reality (e.g. the monetary form of commodity production
hidden social labor).