social practices, but, on the contrary, they presu...

social practices, but, on the contrary, they presuppose and require identification
of clutches between them. The study of discursive practices and discursive
ensembles that arise as a result, should show how
historically, specific rules are formed objects of certain Sciences (for
they are not in"the words" nor in "things"; how to build statements
(because they are not subject to any transcendental entity or individual
subjectivity,but only the impersonal subject of the discussion); as specified
concepts (by linking discursive elements to pre-level --
by crossing, substitution, displacement, removal ,
compatibility of incompatibility, etc.); how are those elections
or other mental moves (in those cases where the seemingly same
conditions is allowed opposite decision).
Neither discursive practices nor their articulation in discursive
ensembles are imposed on episteme "Words and things". This indicates
significant shifts in the methodological position of the author. It is not
only in renaming of old concepts (the concept of "episteme" almost
almost never found in later works, Foucault), but to identify new
opportunities research work.