installed here regarding the word exactly will fit
explained above ontological formula of the symbol as fact,
Nessa adherent to its energy the energy of another essence, Cakobau
energy is the essence of the one second" (Op. Vol. 2. P. 293). As you can see,
symbol, by P. Florenskiy, makes a transition from low energy to
more from low information richness to more.
Science P. Florensky also defines as a symbolic description,
because it is replacing reality with symbols. However, there is
the real danger of bringing into this reality of characteristics
really inherent in the symbol, not the reality. We therefore propose the following
methodological technique: "the description should, however, be borne in mind and
the symbolic nature of the symbols themselves, i.e. special force all the time
keep immediately and in the symbol and the symbolized. The description should be
ambivalent" (Florensky P. A. Science as a symbolic description of the //
Florensky P. A. Soch. -- Vol. 2. -- M., 1990. P. 120). And then there is a problem
"frame", as a semiotician, the favorite of later generations, starting with
Boris Uspensky: the problem is that, "transgressing the verge
character, these images are not off the pedestal of aesthetic isolation and
does not intervene in life, like a uniform with her part of it. Images
retractable in the plane of the frame; the naturalism of the painting to "I want to take
hand"; external zvukopodrazhanii in the music; protocollist in poetry and
etc. ( ... ) Not only reviving the portrait (Gogol) or separated shadow
(Andersen), but also materialized the scheme of science (...) or public
class, self-determined activities can can to cling to life and choke her" (There
same.P.121).![]()
explained above ontological formula of the symbol as fact,
Nessa adherent to its energy the energy of another essence, Cakobau
energy is the essence of the one second" (Op. Vol. 2. P. 293). As you can see,
symbol, by P. Florenskiy, makes a transition from low energy to
more from low information richness to more.
Science P. Florensky also defines as a symbolic description,
because it is replacing reality with symbols. However, there is
the real danger of bringing into this reality of characteristics
really inherent in the symbol, not the reality. We therefore propose the following
methodological technique: "the description should, however, be borne in mind and
the symbolic nature of the symbols themselves, i.e. special force all the time
keep immediately and in the symbol and the symbolized. The description should be
ambivalent" (Florensky P. A. Science as a symbolic description of the //
Florensky P. A. Soch. -- Vol. 2. -- M., 1990. P. 120). And then there is a problem
"frame", as a semiotician, the favorite of later generations, starting with
Boris Uspensky: the problem is that, "transgressing the verge
character, these images are not off the pedestal of aesthetic isolation and
does not intervene in life, like a uniform with her part of it. Images
retractable in the plane of the frame; the naturalism of the painting to "I want to take
hand"; external zvukopodrazhanii in the music; protocollist in poetry and
etc. ( ... ) Not only reviving the portrait (Gogol) or separated shadow
(Andersen), but also materialized the scheme of science (...) or public
class, self-determined activities can can to cling to life and choke her" (There
same.P.121).