The next step from the symbolic towards the materiality of the word lies in
the fact that father Paul was called magic words. In their work
"Magicnet the words" father Paul as a word is very interesting -
the "amphibious" because it is the mediator between the internal world and
external. And here comes the idea of concentration in the word. "Gathered in one
the focus of the historical will of the whole people -- the word I have in my
disposal of the matter-is not in force, but only in its ability to send I need
way" (Soch. Vol. 2. P. 263). The power of the word he sees in the helicity of its structure
-- "layering of samemy deposited in the word is not arbitrary, but
some, more than only logically coherent order, and therefore, is
to take the end of the thread, entourage into a tangle of powerful will and widely comprehensive
the minds of the people, -- and inevitable sequence will lead individual
along the spirit of this whole thread, no matter how long it was, and unwittingly
this would be at the other end of the thread, in the very center of all the tangle, the
concepts, feelings, and wills that he wasn't given" (There
same. P. 263). Here he makes an important conclusion, which is then used in
considering the name: "the name as such, i.e. any the name, certainly
effective, cannot remain without effect on the carrier. Hence, as
it is said, follows the imperative: if any names are effective, if
Ivana, Paula, Alexandra should be such and such-and then every
Ivan, Paul, Alexander, etc. can not be, each in accordance with
his name" (ibid.P.267).![]()
the fact that father Paul was called magic words. In their work
"Magicnet the words" father Paul as a word is very interesting -
the "amphibious" because it is the mediator between the internal world and
external. And here comes the idea of concentration in the word. "Gathered in one
the focus of the historical will of the whole people -- the word I have in my
disposal of the matter-is not in force, but only in its ability to send I need
way" (Soch. Vol. 2. P. 263). The power of the word he sees in the helicity of its structure
-- "layering of samemy deposited in the word is not arbitrary, but
some, more than only logically coherent order, and therefore, is
to take the end of the thread, entourage into a tangle of powerful will and widely comprehensive
the minds of the people, -- and inevitable sequence will lead individual
along the spirit of this whole thread, no matter how long it was, and unwittingly
this would be at the other end of the thread, in the very center of all the tangle, the
concepts, feelings, and wills that he wasn't given" (There
same. P. 263). Here he makes an important conclusion, which is then used in
considering the name: "the name as such, i.e. any the name, certainly
effective, cannot remain without effect on the carrier. Hence, as
it is said, follows the imperative: if any names are effective, if
Ivana, Paula, Alexandra should be such and such-and then every
Ivan, Paul, Alexander, etc. can not be, each in accordance with
his name" (ibid.P.267).