As you can see, similar to the symbolic formula we already had. But in this case, we specified the relation of different signs, which simultaneously act as subjects, and elements in various propositions in a conjunction is followed.
Judgment: "Man" as an object that has a property of "biological organism". And "Biological body" as an object that has the property "mortality". These two judgments show that the signs relate to each other in strict sequence: the predicate becomes the subject with his sign and this whole structure is the first subject that allows to make a conclusion: "people", as the object also has the property to be "mortal."
You can build a two-stage connection when the symptom directly is the predicate of the subject. You can also build a three-stage scheme when the sign belongs to the first entity indirectly through another symptom, as in the above example. Allowed the formation of four or more stages, at least, until, until you made a certain judgment as an axiom, i.e. a true proposition as a final conclusion that solves the problem. Always used the word "If...", which means that you are allowed to take judgment for granted.
The word "if" is a very interesting education. It means that the one who speaks to another or to himself, offers to confirm or not to confirm a certain condition. But to confirm - to bring this condition (sentence and its meaning) in a line with the axiom. In other words, using the word "if", the author requires the consent order, that provision is present, is the place to be. If another (or I) affirm, that it acts as a true premise. And before that it has only the form might is true. When they say: "If Socrates is man, then," it means, do you agree that Socrates man, etc. If you do not agree, the package is destroyed, if you agree, then the premise becomes, at least, conventional true, at least for two. In this case we are talking about the logic of question and answer, this will speak a few below, and as you can see in my book: "Why people ask questions?"
![]()
Judgment: "Man" as an object that has a property of "biological organism". And "Biological body" as an object that has the property "mortality". These two judgments show that the signs relate to each other in strict sequence: the predicate becomes the subject with his sign and this whole structure is the first subject that allows to make a conclusion: "people", as the object also has the property to be "mortal."
You can build a two-stage connection when the symptom directly is the predicate of the subject. You can also build a three-stage scheme when the sign belongs to the first entity indirectly through another symptom, as in the above example. Allowed the formation of four or more stages, at least, until, until you made a certain judgment as an axiom, i.e. a true proposition as a final conclusion that solves the problem. Always used the word "If...", which means that you are allowed to take judgment for granted.
The word "if" is a very interesting education. It means that the one who speaks to another or to himself, offers to confirm or not to confirm a certain condition. But to confirm - to bring this condition (sentence and its meaning) in a line with the axiom. In other words, using the word "if", the author requires the consent order, that provision is present, is the place to be. If another (or I) affirm, that it acts as a true premise. And before that it has only the form might is true. When they say: "If Socrates is man, then," it means, do you agree that Socrates man, etc. If you do not agree, the package is destroyed, if you agree, then the premise becomes, at least, conventional true, at least for two. In this case we are talking about the logic of question and answer, this will speak a few below, and as you can see in my book: "Why people ask questions?"