But the logic of repetition is, first and foremost, the logic of finding the right element for the task. From this comes the expression "trial and error". First, finding a seemingly necessary element in solving the problem, later it turns out that it is not suitable. Just because an object has many characteristics that can be and finding the right way of solving the problem. Thus, the object always has a limited set of features, which may not be needed to solve the problem of the item.
However, increasingly the solution is connected not by the elements, but with the right context. As we have said, everything is interconnected, and the chain of logical sequence is never interrupted. This means that there is always the opportunity to find the element that symptom and, owing to their variety, to finally solve the problem. To find, and not to open, not to invent, etc. in Other words, it is necessary to find what has left its mark. And the trail always has: all that happened, all that is necessary is saved.
Adherence is never straightforward. Sometimes it is so is kind of that to find the beginning and end is practically impossible, so many various branches, digressions, dead-end turns, etc, etc the Quest to solve the problem, this is often a complicated maze with only one correct or most efficient output, and several possible solutions, and, of course, with the presence of many dead ends. Purely arbitrary, and clearly the search for ways of solving the problem, by switching from one basis element to another can be represented thus:
![]()
However, increasingly the solution is connected not by the elements, but with the right context. As we have said, everything is interconnected, and the chain of logical sequence is never interrupted. This means that there is always the opportunity to find the element that symptom and, owing to their variety, to finally solve the problem. To find, and not to open, not to invent, etc. in Other words, it is necessary to find what has left its mark. And the trail always has: all that happened, all that is necessary is saved.
Adherence is never straightforward. Sometimes it is so is kind of that to find the beginning and end is practically impossible, so many various branches, digressions, dead-end turns, etc, etc the Quest to solve the problem, this is often a complicated maze with only one correct or most efficient output, and several possible solutions, and, of course, with the presence of many dead ends. Purely arbitrary, and clearly the search for ways of solving the problem, by switching from one basis element to another can be represented thus: