The fact is that in any situation, which is not fully known or not fully known, necessarily remains some area of generic knowledge, which allows you to get a glimpse of partly unknown outside of the subject area. Consciousness, based on its database as at the past model knowledge and on partial reactions of the external object, yet comes to an adequate reflection of the essence of the object and finds the right solution.
It turns out this is due to at least three properties of consciousness: 1. The past knowledge is always generalized and in this respect is true, i.e. it is already incorporated part of the solution. 2. An external object is never new, and it means that there are boundary elements of the object, thanks to which, the consciousness and penetrates into the true meaning of the object. 3. Through question-answer relationships mind constantly probes the external object and in accordance with his reaction, he corrects their understanding and their actions to solve their tasks.
This is a technique well known in logic, the representation of an uncertain series model of borderline situations that can be described in the known meanings and their combinations. And then to connect them and give them a new meaning and a new designation, such as a new sound or a new word or a new sentence is like a symbol. But necessarily they must be the border and have things in common for each of the situations.
Thus, the solution of the problem, i.e., of action in an uncertain situation, primarily through building logical forms and techniques of meditation, on the basis of available knowledge base as model knowledge. And already at this stage, attributing meaning to their conceptual designs, and through them, and external subject area. But here we have its disadvantage.
Because of the conservatism and builds concepts and ideas generated by the mind, they are often at odds with reality and the person often falls into the trap: he thinks one thing and does another, but in reality it turns out is what was the third and most often unexpected. All it is a measure of the mismatch of conceptual knowledge, and entities external to the subject area. The resolution of this conflict is carried out through the conceptual constant of preostanovlena semantic context. Meaning is defined only in the context of other words (contexts) from known and unknown and private to shared and Vice versa. And if the situation is to put in a different context, it generally formed a somewhat different meaning.
The same thing happens in different conceptual structures. And since the meaning of mandatory is expressed in the words, making new words, e.g., synonyms, allows you to set the class of synonyms. This in turn allows us to trace how the meaning of a word presented or taken as the key. So let's move to our next section of the reflection activity with the words as synonyms.
![]()
It turns out this is due to at least three properties of consciousness: 1. The past knowledge is always generalized and in this respect is true, i.e. it is already incorporated part of the solution. 2. An external object is never new, and it means that there are boundary elements of the object, thanks to which, the consciousness and penetrates into the true meaning of the object. 3. Through question-answer relationships mind constantly probes the external object and in accordance with his reaction, he corrects their understanding and their actions to solve their tasks.
This is a technique well known in logic, the representation of an uncertain series model of borderline situations that can be described in the known meanings and their combinations. And then to connect them and give them a new meaning and a new designation, such as a new sound or a new word or a new sentence is like a symbol. But necessarily they must be the border and have things in common for each of the situations.
Thus, the solution of the problem, i.e., of action in an uncertain situation, primarily through building logical forms and techniques of meditation, on the basis of available knowledge base as model knowledge. And already at this stage, attributing meaning to their conceptual designs, and through them, and external subject area. But here we have its disadvantage.
Because of the conservatism and builds concepts and ideas generated by the mind, they are often at odds with reality and the person often falls into the trap: he thinks one thing and does another, but in reality it turns out is what was the third and most often unexpected. All it is a measure of the mismatch of conceptual knowledge, and entities external to the subject area. The resolution of this conflict is carried out through the conceptual constant of preostanovlena semantic context. Meaning is defined only in the context of other words (contexts) from known and unknown and private to shared and Vice versa. And if the situation is to put in a different context, it generally formed a somewhat different meaning.
The same thing happens in different conceptual structures. And since the meaning of mandatory is expressed in the words, making new words, e.g., synonyms, allows you to set the class of synonyms. This in turn allows us to trace how the meaning of a word presented or taken as the key. So let's move to our next section of the reflection activity with the words as synonyms.