In the proposal, the dominant is established as a fact, which is in the process of the interaction constant. Moreover, having the longest time indicator - always have constant action - mortality and therefore a constant place - a person's life. In other words mandatory, the principle of the unity of place, time and action. Thus, the main subject in this sentence is not "people" and not "mortality", and that "people are always mortal."
It is the primary object of the concept and the problem you want to solve using logic, reasoning, or as we call it - contextual logic, i.e. the logic of the context. If you do not violate the laws of its construction, the concept becomes true, at least for one person. However in this case it takes the form of a conceptual-hypothetical or perhaps real knowledge.
And that would prove, need to do some mandatory operations: to specify the main object, to show that is dominant, to determine the nature of the action and to set time limits, place of origin events. And most importantly to establish the nature of the relationship between them. The last is the most difficult, because the nature and essence of communication is always dictated by the manmade task.
In a world of many different typical situations, precisely the world always consists of typical situations. (The uncertainty of this deviation from the model situation). Each scenario describes short-term, which reflects the main characteristics of this type of situation, but only in the most General terms. Each scenario contains some many similar objects, which in some of its parts, as elements, describe the General model of the situation. Naturally the contents of each such object has a reflection in some part in the basic word-concept. But, nevertheless, each object has its specific content. Each such object is essentially a fragment or a private area of a common model of the situation.
Each private region total typical situations basic word-concept can change its meaning and often very dramatically. As a result of the decision of particular tasks is the word-concept can no longer be used because it does not describe this private situation. Clear. that this notion should be clarified.
It is the primary object of the concept and the problem you want to solve using logic, reasoning, or as we call it - contextual logic, i.e. the logic of the context. If you do not violate the laws of its construction, the concept becomes true, at least for one person. However in this case it takes the form of a conceptual-hypothetical or perhaps real knowledge.
And that would prove, need to do some mandatory operations: to specify the main object, to show that is dominant, to determine the nature of the action and to set time limits, place of origin events. And most importantly to establish the nature of the relationship between them. The last is the most difficult, because the nature and essence of communication is always dictated by the manmade task.
In a world of many different typical situations, precisely the world always consists of typical situations. (The uncertainty of this deviation from the model situation). Each scenario describes short-term, which reflects the main characteristics of this type of situation, but only in the most General terms. Each scenario contains some many similar objects, which in some of its parts, as elements, describe the General model of the situation. Naturally the contents of each such object has a reflection in some part in the basic word-concept. But, nevertheless, each object has its specific content. Each such object is essentially a fragment or a private area of a common model of the situation.
Each private region total typical situations basic word-concept can change its meaning and often very dramatically. As a result of the decision of particular tasks is the word-concept can no longer be used because it does not describe this private situation. Clear. that this notion should be clarified.
