Let me now briefly mention the main features of the proposed
hypotheses that point to its plausibility.
With the right interpretation of all natural processes, and organic and
inorganic what happened in the old days, they are commonly referred to
the same reasons that apply now. So it is done in Geology, and
in biology and in Philology. Here we have a specified characteristic
there. Giving nicknames, their inheritance and to some extent about them
interpretation - all of this still takes place between us; and when the names have not yet
existed, the language was neverovatan and knowledge is so elementary, as in
ancient times, it is easy to agree that the results had to be
just as we have.
hypotheses that point to its plausibility.
With the right interpretation of all natural processes, and organic and
inorganic what happened in the old days, they are commonly referred to
the same reasons that apply now. So it is done in Geology, and
in biology and in Philology. Here we have a specified characteristic
there. Giving nicknames, their inheritance and to some extent about them
interpretation - all of this still takes place between us; and when the names have not yet
existed, the language was neverovatan and knowledge is so elementary, as in
ancient times, it is easy to agree that the results had to be
just as we have.